Date Set For Broe v. Reed
December 10, 2008
Contact: Stephen Pidgeon, Attorney at Law, P.S.
Tel: (425) 605-4774 Fax: (425) 818-5371
Email: attorney@stephenpidgeon.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
12 Washington voters sue to set aside the election of Barack Obama in Washington.
Bellevue, WA, December 10, 2008 — The Washington Supreme Court has set a date for the case Broe v. Reed, to be heard en banc on January 8, 2009.
On December 4, 2008, James (Jim) Broe and 11 other Washington voters sued Secretary of State Sam Reed in the Washington Supreme Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to require the Secretary to set aside the votes cast for Senator Barack Obama, because at the time of the election, Senator Obama had failed to establish that he was a “natural born citizen” of the United States, failed to establish that he was an American citizen, and that he was not running under his legal name of Barry Soetoro.
“The issue of standing seems to be behind us,” said Stephen Pidgeon, counsel for the plaintiffs. “What remains is to establish the duty of the Secretary of State, under Article III, Sections 4 and 17 of the Washington constitution, under RCW 29A.04.230 which names the Secretary as the state’s chief of elections, and under relevant administrative codes which also require the Secretary to act.”
Pidgeon goes on to say that “each candidate that stands in a primary election must make a declaration of candidacy, stating that ‘at the time of filing this declaration, I am legally qualified to assume office if elected.’ The Secretary of State has a constitutionally imposed duty to determine if the candidate is telling the truth.”
Comments
27 Responses to “Date Set For Broe v. Reed”
Got something to say?
God bless your efforts, and God bless our Constitution. As a matter of fact there is now an effort to call a Constitutional Convention in the works. WHO wants to change our Constitution? They have 39 out of 40 required votes to call for con-con. Let’s find out…
Member,
PUMApac.org
Done very professionally on your part. Disappointed in that it’s being heard after Dec. 15th though. This is the urgency our government places on its survival? Makes sense. Look at society today.
My feeling is that with all the lawsuits that are or will be filed will have no impact on what has happened or what will happen. The Democratic Liberal steamroller will be very hard to stop and the damage has already been done.
The Democrat/Liberals control vertually all the news media and they have no respect for the U.S. Constitution unless it benifits them. I don’t feel that we will ever find out all that we need to know about Obama and his background. And after the swearing in, it will be too late to correct things. I pray that our great nation will withstand the corruption the Democrat/Liberals have levied on the U.S. and us.
The Supreme Court of the US has spoken through their inaction the past two weeks
and by so doing have yielded our Constitution to majority rule.
http://thenma.org/blogs//index.php/libertyforusa/2008/12/14/the-death-of-respect
I wish you all the best of luck, the date set being in state court though is after January 6th when Congress meets to certify Obama’s election.
So far the courts have allowed no remedy to the people who want the Constitution upheld, and this seems to be the predetermined outcome.
The door to our Presidency is now open to anyone. The constitution irrelevant.
it is vitally important that we continue to persist in our efforts to defend the constitution. we must NEVER allow the obama administration to side-step the
cloud of suspicion and doubt that hangs over it.
The prior lawsuits have had their problems. Berg’s lawsuit, for example, had many problems. Party plaintiffs or complainants are honing their skills and their lawyers are perfecting their strategies.
Remember, Miranda and Escobedo were not the first to challenge police tactics — but their lawyers had finally perfected the strategy to launch a successful attack (whether or not one accepts the results). The same holds true for the “tobacco” lawsuits (again, whether or not one accepts the results).
I’ve heard that, for some reason, possibly Gregoire’s case from 2004 (which that Democrat won), that WA State is supposedly “different” than other states in terms of eligibility of candidates or for some reason having to do with eligibility.
Can someone here tell me what that difference, if any, is?
Thanks.
I think the beauty of this particular case is that the defendants do NOT include Obama “directly”, therfore his attack-dog lawyers will have no say in the matter. (I’m guessing, of course…)
Or would they???
Washington has a unique statute which allows registered voters to sue if the candidate who was elected was at the time of the election ineligible to assume the office. RCW 29A.68.060(2).
The issue before the court is whether Sen. Obama established his eligibility before the election, not whether he is natural born, a citizen and so forth. Broe claims that Obama had the burden, and did not meet it. Broe also claims that the Sec’y of State had an obligation to disqualify since eligibility was not established.
Argument is set for January 8; however, the issue of whether Sen. Obama was an American citizen at the time he took the office of President will never be moot. Always throughout the study of American history over the next centuries, this presidency will be questioned.
He who takes crooked ways will be found out proverbs 10 -9 back in roman time the great apostle Paul was about to be killed and alls he did was tell the commander that he was born a roman citizen. they all backed off immediately. citizenship has great power. act 22 -22 to end of chapter
Watching the courts toying with citizens is heartbreaking, but watching citizens moving forward regardless is so inspiring. Hearing that Soetoro/Obama is using an illegal name, traveling to countries under the Soetoro name where Americans are not allowed, and refusing to provide a simple document, and Senators say a health official is we have to believe, without a document, without the official under oath….and now hearing that marriage papers have documented that Soetoro was born in Africa. All too amazing. If we can clear the deck of Soetoro/Obama, Pelosi might want to start packing her suitcases. She signed documents Obama was eligible. Wonder if she sleeps at night.
Can other citizens sign on to this and how?
Stephen,
Thanks again for your efforts! Will this action require the production of evidence related to Obama’s eligibility?
Thank you!
Stephen,
Thanks again for your efforts! Will this action require the production of evidence related to Obama’s eligibility? Thank you!
If you put up an address or something where I can send a donation other than going through Plains Radio, I’m sure there’s more than me who would happy to help Steve out.
But I’m not sending money to Ed. Forget that idea. Why would Steve need a 3rd party to get money to him anyway? Sounds fishy to me.
Dear Mr. Pigeon,
I pray that God gives you the wisdom, the words and the strength to win.
Thank you!
Sincerely,
Kadie
It’s Russian Orthodox Christmas today (01/07/09), which is December 25, 2008, under the old calendar. Christ is born Glorify him.
Let us pray that our saviour Jesus Christ will deliver us another present in additional to eternal salvation, and that is the wisdom of the Washington State Supreme court to put aside any political considerations and require that the State of Hawaii supply the original vault copy of Obama’s (Soetoro’s) birth certificate.
In the end, we must all trust in the wisdom of the almighty…no matter the outcome.
Our eternal salvation is secure in our belief in God and his only begotten son Jesus Christ no matter what occurs in the future. Even if this nation is rendered asunder and hundreds of millions die, God will ultimately bless and restore this one nation under God.
Good work and good luck.
For my view on this see:
http://www.joesixpack.me
What was the result of this lawsuit???
Attorney Stephen Pidgeon
All reference to the INS port of Entry Document /Obama’s Mother 8/10/1961 seems to be removed from Google search.
I had read that they will be produced to Public on Friday 1/16/09
I pray the the Supreme Court will allow this document to be submitted & the Supreme Court will do their Constitutional duty to uphold the Constitution. They must stop Obama from being Inaugurated
Stephen, do you have an update for us?? Did you ever take your case to SCOTUS? or is it still within the State?
Thanks.
Actually everyone That he put in his cabinet, Hillary and on down to all of his placements should be removed for all he did as the Usurper is totally Illegal , all Laws will be VOIDED. And I still want to know why he got to keep his Blackberry , is it so he could inform his Arabic Partners ( I have the transcript of the tape the L.A. times has been hushed to not release of his meeting in L.A. Ca. with the American Arabic group and he states thanks for the money ) of troop movements that sent him Money so he could pay off certain people and certain Media to buy the Election. I seem to remember the super Delegate in California that was auctioning off his vote to the highest bidder *supposively for charity* but Obama got his vote so why wasn’t that disclosed as a voter infringement and Obama disqualified. I’m shure the tape of the Ca. super delegate advertising the sale of his vote can be scraped up and records of his vote traced.
Ya put a smile in my face.
Very nice site! Good work and good luck.
EXCLUSIVE! Photo Gallery and Interview with ELBOWTOE
Add A Comment
Very interesting, thanks!